A debate on the arbitrary argument for the immorality of homosexuality.

Saying that homosexuality is wrong because it is unnatural is ridiculous. 1. The descriptive laws of temper. The laws of nature do non support homosexuality because it is not believed to be a act that takes place in nature. crotchet does in distributor point occur in nature. There is a such affair as a homosexual animal. You be not pee to follow the laws of nature and there is no real attend for doing so. It is impossible for a homosexual to be violating the laws of nature. 2. The schmalzy as a form of the unnatural. Saying that homosexuality is conventionalised and not essential to human life. That which is artificial is not always bad. Without artificial devices many another(prenominal) a(prenominal) lives would not exist because of diseases that these artificial devices cure. 3. Anything r are or abnormal is unnatural. queerness is not the normal thing that inner circle choose, which makes it droll and therefore unnatural. Just because a behavior is un common does not mean that it is condemnable. There is no reason to opine of that uncommon behavior is morally wrong. There are many things that are abnormal but that does not make them ethically wrong. 4. Any use of an organ or an instrument that is wayward to its principal purpose or function in unnatural.

Homosexuality is promoting the misuse of ones sexual organs. In this misuse the organ is no longer doing the function for which it was made. You cannot condemn homosexuality on the guinea pig that it is contrary to its purpose. Many body parts are lend oneself for something aside from their primary func tion. Such as dentitioning that are used ! for tearing a package open. We would say that teeth are to be used for chewing and nothing more. simply using teeth to open something is not morally wrong. If you limit to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper